Understanding Eviction Representation for All (ERA): Challenges and Lessons Learned

Eviction Representation for All (ERA) was an incredibly innovative program that aimed to revolutionize tenant rights by offering free legal representation to all tenants facing eviction in Multnomah County. The core objective of ERA was to ensure that individuals from all income levels received equal protection through legal counsel during eviction proceedings. In this blog post, we will delve into the critical features of ERA and discuss the valuable lessons learned from its journey, even though the measure did not pass.

One significant concern raised during the discussions revolved around the potential impact of the proposed capital gains tax on all Oregon residents, irrespective of their income. Critics argued that the tax lacked exemptions from other state and federal laws, making all Oregonians susceptible. To provide context, it is essential to note that in 2020, out of the 1,919,410 full-year tax returns filed, approximately 20% (equivalent to 391,550 returns) reported Capital Gains or Losses. This data, provided by the Oregon Center for Public Policy, highlights the significance of considering the implications of such a tax reform.

Another concern was regarding the proposed measure's funding mechanism, which presented an uncharted territory. Implementing a progressive measure like the Capital Gains tax differed from previous tax measures that typically relied on flat or equality-focused taxes rather than equity-focused ones. While this presented a challenge, it also opened up opportunities for exploring new avenues to create a fairer system.

Administrative costs were also scrutinized, with some arguing that they would absorb more than 50% of the generated revenue. This claim was mentioned in a Willamette Week article. However, it is worth highlighting the insights shared by Colleen Carroll from the Eviction Representation for All campaign. Carroll proposed an alternative implementation method that could significantly reduce costs. Her suggestion involved incorporating the tax as an additional line on existing tax returns, thereby minimizing initial and ongoing expenses. This pragmatic approach deviated from the more costly option of implementing a separate tax form.

The journey of the Eviction Representation for All campaign has provided us with invaluable knowledge and a deeper understanding of the challenges involved in advocating for tenant rights. Although the measure did not succeed, we are committed to exploring new initiatives and avenues that aim to create a more just and equitable environment. Our collective goal is to ensure that all individuals facing eviction have access to the necessary resources and support they need. Working together can actively mitigate wrongful evictions and foster a stronger, more resilient community.

Follow us this month on our social media channels (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn), and sign up for our e-newsletters to stay in touch!